Home › Blog › DepEd Order No. 016 s. 2026
📌 Quick Answer — DepEd Order No. 016, s. 2026
DepEd Order No. 016, s. 2026, signed on June 4, 2026 by Secretary Sonny Angara, establishes the Guidelines on Lesson Planning and Learning Design. It prescribes the ILAW Framework — Intentions, Learning Experience, Assessing Learning, and Ways Forward — as the new national standard for lesson planning in all public schools. It repeals DO No. 42, s. 2016.
Issued June 4, 2026 · Signed by Secretary Sonny Angara · Effective SY 2026–2027
🎯 Generate your ILAW lesson plan — fully aligned with DO No. 016, s. 2026
Our AI generator follows the exact ILAW framework required by this order. All grade levels and subjects. Free trial available.
✦ Generate ILAW Lesson Plan NowTransition Period: Old DLL/DLP Still Allowed in Term 1
Per Section 43 (Transitory Provision) of DO No. 016, s. 2026, teachers may continue using the DLL or DLP formats from DO No. 42, s. 2016 until the end of the first term of SY 2026–2027. Full implementation of the ILAW framework begins in the second term of SY 2026–2027.
DepEd Order No. 016, series of 2026 is the official DepEd policy titled "Guidelines on Lesson Planning and Learning Design." It was issued on June 4, 2026 and signed by Education Secretary Sonny Angara. The order recognizes the need to strengthen and refine the policy on daily lesson preparation to better support effective teaching and meaningful learning.
According to the order, it establishes a more flexible, efficient, and context-responsive framework for lesson planning across all key stages. It reinforces DepEd's system-wide commitment to continuous instructional improvement, where teachers, ALS implementers, and instructional leaders use lesson planning, reflection, and assessment data to enhance teaching and learning practices.
This order is aligned with DO No. 009, s. 2026 (Guidelines on the Implementation of the Three-Term School Calendar in Basic Education) and repeals DO No. 42, s. 2016 — the previous Policy Guidelines on Daily Lesson Preparation for the K to 12 Basic Education Program.
Per Section 3 of the guidelines, this order applies to:
All public elementary and secondary schools
DepEd-operated community learning centers (CLCs)
DepEd-recognized ALS Providers
Basic education units of state or local universities and colleges (SUCs and LUCs)
Private elementary and secondary schools are encouraged to adopt these guidelines in alignment with their respective institutional policies.
Per Section 7, the lesson plan shall serve as a tool for organizing instructional thinking. To simplify lesson planning, the following ILAW Framework, which consists of four core elements, shall be used by teachers and ALS implementers:
I — Intentions
Learning Competencies — Teachers shall identify the learning competencies to be targeted. Competencies may span several lessons, provided that each session contributes to clear and progressive goals toward learner mastery.
Learning Objectives — Teachers shall unpack, cluster, or sequence learning competencies into clear, focused, and manageable learning objectives aligned with learner readiness, instructional context, and available learning time.
L — Learning Experience
Learning Resources — Select learning resources that are relevant, appropriate, and aligned with the learning objectives. Alternative resources for home-based learning shall also be prepared should face-to-face instruction be interrupted.
Pre-lesson Activity — Design brief introductory activities, routines, or check-ins that activate prior knowledge, establish readiness, and prepare learners for the learning session.
Lesson Flow — Apply learning design principles throughout the session to ensure the learning experience remains coherent, engaging, responsive, and developmentally appropriate. Instruction shall be adjusted based on learner responses, questions, and emerging needs.
Opportunities for Integration and Contextualization — Identify opportunities to meaningfully connect lessons within and across learning areas and incorporate relevant real-life, cultural, or community-based contexts.
A — Assessing Learning
Formative Assessments — Conduct formative checks throughout the learning session to monitor learner understanding and progress toward learning objectives. These assessments shall guide immediate instructional adjustments and help identify learners who need additional support.
W — Ways Forward
Reflective Practice — At the end of each lesson or session, teachers shall reflect on the teaching experience and evidence of learning. They shall then identify next instructional steps such as remediation, reteaching, and enrichment, among others.
Extended Learning Opportunities — Teachers may provide additional learning experiences within or beyond the classroom to reinforce learners' knowledge, skills, values, or competencies. These may serve as enrichment or remediation for learners requiring additional support.
Per Sections 8 and 9, teachers and ALS implementers shall use the Lesson Planning Rubric (Annex A) as a self-check tool to determine the alignment of their lesson plans with the essential standards in these guidelines. The rubric shall be used only to support professional reflection and instructional improvement — not as a compliance checklist or scoring tool for paperwork completion.
| I can say that in my lesson plan... | Yes | Not Yet |
|---|---|---|
| Intentions are clearly stated, with appropriate learning competencies articulated. | ☐ | ☐ |
| Intentions are evident across all sections. Thus, there is coherence. | ☐ | ☐ |
| Learning experience is clear — another teacher can implement this lesson without additional explanation. | ☐ | ☐ |
| Learning experience is well-designed, with intentionally embedded Learning Design Principles. | ☐ | ☐ |
| Learning experience maximizes available opportunities for integration and contextualization. | ☐ | ☐ |
| Learning experience is inclusive, providing opportunities to support learners with disabilities, barriers, and unique contexts. | ☐ | ☐ |
| Assessment strategies are integrated throughout the session to see learners' progress or if they need support. | ☐ | ☐ |
| Assessment strategies generate evidence if learning is successful. | ☐ | ☐ |
| Ways forward and described interventions are actionable, providing ways to extend or adjust learning based on reflections. | ☐ | ☐ |
Per Sections 17–19, the Learning Design Principles describe the intended learning experience and the core features of effective instruction. These principles guide teachers in selecting instructional methods and approaches responsive to their learner needs and contexts. Not all principles are expected to be evident in every lesson — teachers are encouraged to apply them intentionally over time.
Per Sections 23–25, consistent with DO No. 003, s. 2026 (Foundational Guidelines on Artificial Intelligence in Basic Education), the application of AI in teaching, learning, and assessment shall function strictly as an auxiliary tool. AI systems are prohibited from replacing the essential role of teachers or the holistic evaluation of learners. Fully AI-generated lesson plans shall not be allowed.
🚫 Prohibited AI Use in Lesson Planning
AI tools shall not be used for core instructional decision-making, including: defining learning objectives, unpacking competencies, designing learning experiences and instructional strategies (i.e. the ILAW Framework), and/or making critical judgments in response to learner needs.
⚠️ Limited AI Use in Lesson Planning
AI may be used in a limited capacity for support tasks and functions (i.e. rephrasing, organizing, or refining text) only after key instructional decisions (i.e. the ILAW Framework) have already been made and after consultation with co-teachers, instructional leaders, or relevant stakeholders has been maximized. All AI-generated outputs shall remain subject to teacher review, validation, and adaptation.
✅ Guided AI Use in Lesson Planning
For routine and technical support tasks, AI may serve as a low-risk tool. Acceptable uses include grammar and spelling checks, improving clarity of language, formatting support, and translation assistance. All AI-generated outputs shall be carefully reviewed and validated by the teacher prior to integration in the lesson plan.
No extra forms allowed
Per Section 21, Regional Offices, Schools Division Offices, schools, and CLCs shall not require additional or expanded lesson plan templates, supplementary forms, or documentation beyond the simplified standards prescribed in this Order.
Collaborative lesson planning is valid
Per Section 28, the sharing of lesson plans shall be encouraged and recognized as valid evidence of teacher preparation, provided that all participating teachers understand the shared lesson plan and are capable of delivering it effectively.
Lesson plans are not compliance paperwork
Per Section 9, the Lesson Planning Rubric shall be used only to support professional reflection and instructional improvement — not as a compliance checklist or scoring tool for paperwork completion.
Lesson plans may be more detailed for new teachers
Per Section 20, lesson plans may be more detailed when teachers or ALS implementers are handling new, unfamiliar, or complex content, learners, strategies, tools, resources, or modalities. As teachers gain confidence, lesson plans may be more concise.
Multigrade teachers have special provisions
Per Section 14, teachers assigned to multigrade classes may use integrated lesson planning templates that accommodate two or three grade levels simultaneously, provided that all essential lesson plan components are maintained.
Learners with disabilities must be provided for
Per Section 15, for teachers handling learners with disabilities (LWDs), Individualized Education Plans (IEPs), as defined under Republic Act No. 11650, shall serve as a critical reference in lesson planning. Lesson planning shall ensure that reasonable accommodations and modifications are provided so that LWDs can meaningfully participate in learning experiences.
Lesson plan archive: 3-year retention recommended
Per Section 37(e), teachers shall archive lesson plans in either digital or printed formats. A three-year retention period is recommended, but may be overruled for lesson plans deemed exceptional or used as samples for professional development.
The order includes a Lesson Planning Guide (Annex B) as a reference example of how a lesson plan may be organized under the ILAW framework. Per the note in Annex B: "This is provided only as an example for how a lesson plan may be organized based on the ILAW framework. Teachers and schools can adopt this as the template, but it should NOT be interpreted as the sole national format for lesson planning."
The Lesson Planning Guide includes the following header fields:
The body of the lesson plan is structured around the four ILAW sections: Intentions (Learning Competency, Learning Objectives, Learner Context), Learning Experience (Pre-Lesson, Flow, Learning Resources, Integration Opportunities), Assessing Learning (Formative Assessment), and Ways Forward (Extended Learning Opportunities, Reflections).
🚀 Generate Your ILAW Lesson Plan — Aligned with DO No. 016, s. 2026
AI-powered · All grade levels and subjects · Follows the ILAW Framework · Download as Word or PowerPoint
✦ Try Free Now❓ When does DepEd Order No. 016, s. 2026 take effect?
The order shall take effect immediately upon its approval, and fifteen (15) days after its publication in the Official Gazette or a newspaper of general circulation, and filing with the Office of the National Administrative Registrar (ONAR) at the University of the Philippines Law Center (UPLC), UP Diliman, Quezon City. For implementation, teachers may still use the old DLL/DLP format until the end of the first term of SY 2026-2027. Full implementation of the ILAW framework begins in the second term of SY 2026-2027.
❓ What DepEd order does DO No. 016, s. 2026 replace?
DO No. 016, s. 2026 repeals DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2016 or the "Policy Guidelines on Daily Lesson Preparation for the K to 12 Basic Education Program." All other related issuances or any provisions inconsistent with this Order are likewise repealed, rescinded, or modified accordingly.
❓ Can school heads or division offices require teachers to use a different or expanded lesson plan template?
No. Per Section 21, Regional Offices (ROs), Schools Division Offices (SDOs), schools, and CLCs shall not require additional or expanded lesson plan templates, supplementary forms, or documentation beyond the simplified standards prescribed in Section V(A) of this Order.
❓ Is the ILAW Lesson Planning Guide in Annex B required to be followed exactly?
No. Annex B is provided only as an example for how a lesson plan may be organized based on the ILAW framework. Per the note in Annex B, teachers and schools can adopt it as a template, but it should NOT be interpreted as the sole national format for lesson planning. A lesson plan shall be considered sufficient when the learning intentions, learning experience, assessment approach, and ways forward are evident and aligned.
❓ Are fully AI-generated lesson plans allowed under DO No. 016, s. 2026?
No. Per Section 23, the exercise of human judgment, pedagogical discretion, and professional accountability shall remain paramount. AI systems are prohibited from replacing the essential role of teachers. Consequently, fully AI-generated lesson plans shall not be allowed. AI may only be used in a limited or guided capacity as an auxiliary tool.
❓ Who are the Instructional Leaders mentioned in DO No. 016, s. 2026?
Per Section 4(d), Instructional Leaders refer to School Heads, Head Teachers, Master Teachers, ALS Focals, Education Program Supervisors for ALS, and other personnel designated to perform instructional leadership functions, including but not limited to Grade Level Coordinators, Learning Area Coordinators, Department Heads, and Head Teachers reclassified as Teachers V to VII.
❓ For further information about DO No. 016, s. 2026, who can teachers contact?
Per the order itself, for further information, contact the Bureau of Learning Delivery at bld.od@deped.gov.ph, located at the DepEd Complex, Meralco Avenue, Pasig City.
Source: DepEd Order No. 016, s. 2026 — Guidelines on Lesson Planning and Learning Design, issued June 4, 2026.
© 2026 ILAW Lesson Plan AI · ilawlessonplan.com